- #Best photo scanner 2018 for mac software
- #Best photo scanner 2018 for mac series
- #Best photo scanner 2018 for mac mac
None of these scanners is very fast if the software is set to high quality.
#Best photo scanner 2018 for mac mac
On Mac or Win it is possible to drive the Coolscan with up to date third party software like Silverfast or Vuescan that is how I run mine. The Mac version of the Nikon scanning software became incompatible several years ago and wont run on current systems, Windows might be a better situation but I don't know. Nikon might not offer any software that can run the Coolscan on a current operating system.
Some filmstrips, especially 1 or 2 frame ones, are too short to be handled by the autoloader and must be loaded manually with a carrier that looks like the one you'd use with a darkroom enlarger. Mine only came with the filmstrip holder. If automation is important to you, you might make sure the model you get can take the 35mm filmstrip loader or the bulk slide loader. There was also the LS-50 (less capable) vs LS-5000 (more capable). I think the V model was the last version. They came out so long ago that my memory is getting fuzzy, but from what I remember, the Super Coolscan V line is more capable than the Coolscan V line.
#Best photo scanner 2018 for mac series
Can you (or others) recommend the best Coolscans - or series to avoid? Knowing that I could likely get most of my investment back, once I'm done with it: I'd like to buy the fastest and best model. There must be consumer and prosumers levels. Some of the price gap would be down to newness/lack of dings and scratches I suspect the biggest reason for price variation would be the model numbers. I'm interested in scanning a box of old 35mm negs and slides - and doing the same for others (for a fee.) Graybalanced: I checked eBay for Coolscans and there was quite a variety of prices and models. Beyond that point, try $1000 for a discontinued Nikon Coolscan) My 3200 doesn't have this capability but my 4870 does. I'm aware of P/S and LR's dust removal tools (amongst others) but it will take you considerably longer than the added scanning time digital ice brings. No matter what anyone says, it is nearly impossible to get your scanner glass and your photos completely dust free. One major thing I would suggest is to make sure your scanner has some sort of dust removal capability (digital ice or other).
The use of LED means there's no warm-up time so it's faster from clicking the "scan" button to actually scanning. One advantage newer scanners have is the use of LEDs as their light source v fluorescent lights in older units. A 3200 dpi scan of an 8 x 10 at 48 bit depth is a humongous file (hundreds/thousands of MBs) and rarely needed. I have an Epson 3200 that is probably 12 or 13 years old and it's resolution is 3200 dpi (although testing shows that most scanners effective resolution is considerably less than manufacturer's claims). The limited dynamic range of prints will be easily handled by any relatively modern scanner and most have more than enough resolution. Assuming from your post that you're just looking to scan photos and not negatives, I'm not sure that it matters.
0 kommentar(er)
